Stop World Hunger, Stop UN And Ignore COP15

By Karl J. Hansen, klimabedrag.dk

There is nothing more important than having something to eat.  Food is the most important asset to humans and animals alike.  Everything apart from food is of less importance and both the worlds richest and the worlds poorest all need food.   The UN was founded in order to protect all humans, from all countries and of all races.  The fathers of the UN had noble visions and there is no doubt that UN has done a lot of good deeds in the past.

Sadly the UN has made a drastic shift from the the noble idealism into being a wolfpack in sheep clothing.  The primary goal we all should have, namely to ensure we can feed the hard working people in the poor countries, is lost in Limbo as a shadow behind the global warming scam.  In this way the US's IPCC has already been the sole reason why millions cannot afford to pay for food.  Only UN is to blame for this, because they have actively been promoting the use of crops for fuel, in the name of the global warming swindle, and thereby sky-rocketed the price for food.

Saving the planet is a very good thing in case it is in danger.  The planet is always in danger and because Superman is not around any longer, due to kryptonite poisoning, any saving of the planet will cost and cost a lot.  The planet could be hit by a big meteor and kill countless millions of people and animals, but no real precautional measures has been put in place, except maybe by Bruce Willies.  The chance of being hit by such a devastating meteor is so remote that implementing an effective solution, if at all possible, would do more harm than good.  This is the exact same scenario when it comes to the UN's global warming measurements.  The chance that we could encounter thermal runaway due to human activities, in particular CO2, is extremely remote.  With all the changes the planet have been through during it's long life, there is no evidence what so ever, that thermal runaway can occur at all.  We are actually more prone to giant meteors, than to global warming holocaust.

Nevertheless, the UN has decided to manipulate the world into believing we have a huge problem and that a non-green way of life is the cause of it.  If the UN had not gone along with the green global warming con-show and deemed one of our most important trace gasses a pollutant, then millions of people would not need to starve.  The crops would have been used for food and due to the plentifulness, the price would have been much more favourable to everyone, including the poor.  If we could just have more CO2, then we could have even more food for the same money - the greenest gas we have is CO2.

There are many more issues with damage instantiated by the UN.  Think for a moment about the row they create with the horrific stories about about flooded islands, drowning polar bears, ice free Antarctic, extreme weather and the total catastrophy.  These are stories generated by Al Gore, the press, corrupt science journals, greedy or scruples scientists and big business seeing potential marked; but all is spawn from documentation written by the science politicians in the UN.  In this way, the UN is without a doubt the biggest provider of unrest, food reduction and financial dismay.  The net result could very well be that the UN, against their intention, is failing the main objectives, although adhering to them at the same time.  Take a look at this section from the UN:

2. Promoting development based on an integrated approach

43. Sustained economic growth is essential for expanding the resource base for development and, hence, for economic, technical and social transformation. It generates the required financial, physical, human and technological resources. It is also essential to the eradication of poverty. An open and equitable framework for trade, investment and technology transfer, as well as enhanced cooperation in the management of a globalized world economy and in the formulation and implementation of macroeconomic policies, are critical for the promotion of growth and development. While the private sector is a motor for economic growth, the government has an active and essential role in the formulation of economic, social and environmental policies.

The UN is by all means trying eagerly to fulfil the objective of a global economy managed by UN and provided by private enterprise (formulation and implementation of macroeconomic policies / While the private sector is a motor).  However, skimming through the huge arsenal of objectives the UN has put on themselves, the provision of open transfer of technology and assistance in development in developing (read poorer) countries, appears to be essential to UN, but largely neglected in favour of global warming investment.

The question is, if UN has turned into a tool for the green movement?  If so, the future for the poor countries is alarming.  The green movement have many admires at all ages over the whole globe, despite Patic Moore and other Greenpeace co-founders have left due to the inhuman green policy now prevailing in the organisation.  Their name sounds green, but a lot of what they do, is bad for the environment.  Having the UN to help them making the whole world poorer, is one of the worst things you can do to the environment.  It took The Federal Republic Of Germany a lot of money, time and effort to clean-up the former DDR or Eastern Germany.  It takes money, technology and satisfied citizens to make a cleaner world and the UN knows this, but creates the opposite in their more or less hidden aim to generate a world government, using global worming tax as a steppingstone.

Lord Monckton and many others have warned us of this to come.  One of the best outcome of UN's COP15 in Copenhagen would be no outcome at all.  We should demand a reduction in the number of political guides, a reduction in corrupt science, a reduction in the number unproductive jobs, an increase in CO2, an increase in thorium reactors (cheapest/safest electricity production available) and an increase in honest science.  They used to make revolutions in France and maybe we can gather again to fight the green UN vandalism in a somewhat less bloody way.  I think the primary frontier will be the public schools and the universities.

It might take many years before enough of us wake up to rescue what the UN, Al Gore and their followers has destroyed over so many years of promoting the declining global warming caused by natural cycles and nature itself.